summoner icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
summoner copied to clipboard

summoner-tui constraints

Open Anton-Latukha opened this issue 4 years ago • 3 comments

Current build result:

🅸 ~/s/h/m/l> cabal v2-update                                                                                  (1)
Downloading the latest package list from hackage.haskell.org
Updated package list of hackage.haskell.org to the index-state 2021-12-17T11:35:50Z
To revert to previous state run:
    cabal v2-update 'hackage.haskell.org,2021-12-13T13:24:36Z'
🅸 ~/s/h/m/l> cabal v2-install summoner-tui
Resolving dependencies...
cabal: Could not resolve dependencies:
[__0] trying: summoner-tui-2.0.1.1 (user goal)
[__1] next goal: brick (dependency of summoner-tui)
[__1] rejecting: brick-0.65 (conflict: summoner-tui => brick>=0.47 && <0.55)
[__1] skipping: brick-0.64.2, brick-0.64.1, brick-0.64, brick-0.63,
brick-0.62, brick-0.61, brick-0.60.2, brick-0.60.1, brick-0.60, brick-0.59,
brick-0.58.1, brick-0.58, brick-0.57.1, brick-0.57, brick-0.56, brick-0.55
(has the same characteristics that caused the previous version to fail:
excluded by constraint '>=0.47 && <0.55' from 'summoner-tui')
[__1] trying: brick-0.54
[__2] next goal: base (dependency of summoner-tui)
[__2] rejecting: base-4.14.3.0/installed-4.14.3.0 (conflict: brick =>
base<=4.14.0.0)
[__2] skipping: base-4.16.0.0, base-4.15.0.0, base-4.14.3.0, base-4.14.2.0,
base-4.14.1.0 (has the same characteristics that caused the previous version
to fail: excluded by constraint '<=4.14.0.0' from 'brick')
[__2] rejecting: base-4.14.0.0, base-4.13.0.0, base-4.12.0.0, base-4.11.1.0,
base-4.11.0.0, base-4.10.1.0, base-4.10.0.0, base-4.9.1.0, base-4.9.0.0,
base-4.8.2.0, base-4.8.1.0, base-4.8.0.0, base-4.7.0.2, base-4.7.0.1,
base-4.7.0.0, base-4.6.0.1, base-4.6.0.0, base-4.5.1.0, base-4.5.0.0,
base-4.4.1.0, base-4.4.0.0, base-4.3.1.0, base-4.3.0.0, base-4.2.0.2,
base-4.2.0.1, base-4.2.0.0, base-4.1.0.0, base-4.0.0.0, base-3.0.3.2,
base-3.0.3.1 (constraint from non-upgradeable package requires installed
instance)
[__2] fail (backjumping, conflict set: base, brick, summoner-tui)
After searching the rest of the dependency tree exhaustively, these were the
goals I've had most trouble fulfilling: base, brick, summoner-tui

Seems like new versions of brick solve this.

Anton-Latukha avatar Dec 17 '21 11:12 Anton-Latukha

summoner can't be built by GHC newer than 8.10.7, and summoner-tui - by GHC newer than 8.8.4.

It would be great if one could build both under, e.g., GHC-9.0.2. Or at least, GHC-8.10.7. Thanks!

mouse07410 avatar Mar 20 '22 17:03 mouse07410

@mouse07410 the following all compiled successfully for me:

summoner-cli

✓ GHC 9.0.2

cabal update
cabal install summoner --with-compiler=ghc-9.0.2 --allow-newer=base,ghc-prim

summoner-tui

✓ GHC 8.10.7

cabal update
cabal install summoner-tui --with-compiler=ghc-8.10.7 --allow-newer=base

✓ GHC 9.0.2

cabal update
cabal install summoner-tui --with-compiler=ghc-9.0.2 --allow-newer=base,ghc-prim

This suggests that relaxing dependency upper bounds is all that is currently required in order for summoner-cli to support ghc-9.0.2 and summoner-tui to support ghc-8.10.7 and ghc-9.0.2.

Additionally, I would like to note that relude does not compile with base-4.16.* because it re-exports the deprecated Option type. I suspect that as soon as relude is updated to support base-4.16.*, then both summoner-cli and summoner-tuiwill also compile with ghc-9.2.2.

Perhaps a PR bumping bounds is in order!?

recursion-ninja avatar Mar 30 '22 17:03 recursion-ninja

the following all compiled successfully for me: . . .

I confirm that both summoner and summoner-tui compiled/installed fine with the flags you mentioned above. Cabal-3.6.2.0, GHC-9.0.2.

Thanks!

mouse07410 avatar Mar 31 '22 21:03 mouse07410

This should be solved in the main branch now 🙂

vrom911 avatar Oct 06 '22 08:10 vrom911

@vrom911 thank you for adding support for GHC 9.0.2 and 9.2.4.

However, please note that the current latest stable released GHC is 9.4.2. It would be nice to see it supported too.

mouse07410 avatar Oct 06 '22 08:10 mouse07410

Yes, support for the current GHC-9.4.* series, as well as planning for prompt support of the impending GHC-9.6.* series would be greatly appreciated!

recursion-ninja avatar Nov 12 '22 17:11 recursion-ninja