Jérôme Duval
Jérôme Duval
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/871636
> It's needed if we want to merge this all in one go. Otherwise we have to do it in two steps, first enable the new openssl, and then bump...
Just to understand: if this gets built on master, it should also be tested on r1beta4, right?
Also keep in mind, that loading libssl.so.1 and libssl.so.3 in the same application might cause problems.
I see that in Arch the data directory isn't present for openssl 1.1, only for 3.2. Maybe openssl can depend on openssl3
@Begasus I enabled symbol versioning in 2b79a5a87fb11694b575f6202fc9228a9b964456. Because it hasn't been enabled for 1.1, it might help or not.
> @korli I saw you pushed this to master while the changes here are done in a seperate branch, wont those conflict/superseed somewhere? (checking build atm though). this branch can...
> Looks like there is another one in need for a revbump here: > > ``` > Error: problem 1: package libevent_devel-2.1.12-2 requires devel:libcrypto>=1.1, but none of the providers can...
> Didn't check, but a simple revbump (with reference >= 3 for openssl) was enough (for now) to get an updated package. Yeah, it seems to be about correctness, refcounting...
> So it seems curl is the problem here? WebPositive links against libbnetapi.so, which needs libssl.so.1 and libcrypto.so.1. libWebKitLegacy loads libcurl, which in turn loads libssl.so.3. One probably needs a...