Daniel Koo

I believe this would allow users to provide their own implementation of Element class so that they can override methods with custom implementation without the need to extend Element class...

We chose HtmlUnitDriver since this was part of Selenium and maintained by the Selenium community. We initially looked at PhantomJS (GhostDriver). What was the time difference between HTMLUnitDriver and PhantomJS...

Users can use PhantomJS by providing their own SessionFactory implementation right now so it is still possible. Adding easy support so that users can simply provide browser=phantomjs in client properties...

Areas of focus: - Getting started examples - Javadoc API pages

Agreed with this ticket. Any takers?

Cool. We should have good tests around this so that we test this behavior as well as the other existing behaviors. Thanks.

@knappk, do you think you can make a fix before 1.2 release?

Dependency on Firefox may not be a good idea... At least we should check that we are able to exercise all the different ways to load up FF driver (clean,...

You may be able to read the FF config file and figure out your changes (e.g. default download location).

We can apply this via creating custom SessionFactory. Refer to this Google group topic for creating a custom SessionFactory posted by @lathanagaraj : https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jtaf-extwebdriver/TKtOpmIPP-Q