konform-kt
Additional maintainers?..
Hi! We are considering using Konform in our company, but are slightly concerned with decreased velocity of the project lately. Would you be open to accepting new maintainers to ensure the long-term continuity of the project?
I am up for helping. We're making intensive used of it for 4 months and find it very stable and don't yet find any shortcomings.
Also, we have some integrations with Spring that might make a nice HOWTO article if you'd be interested @nlochschmidt
Hey there, as I wrote in #38 I am not opposed to the idea of adding (co-)maintainers to this project.
Great, was just wondering the same. We are using this in our project (and loving it) and I was considering doing some work to update dependencies to make it work with the IR compiler. It's actually blocking us from updating our fritz2 app.
I see that there are a few other open pull requests as well; I might have a go at merging those as well.
I can do all of that on a fork and then create a pull request. Let me know if that works for you or if you prefer some different way of proceeding.
@jillesvangurp could you please open a separate issue for the dependency upgrade that you require? I am currently working on upgrading to Kotlin 1.6 anyways. Otherwise, this project has no dependencies that would need upgrading 🤷
I've been waiting for responses in the issues related to the MRs but I might just go ahead and merge them this week since there doesn't seem to be a response coming 😉
Great, an upgrade to 1.6 is actually what I need. Let me know if you need help with that.
@dhoepelman has joined as a maintainer and we have transitioned into a handover period, see https://github.com/konform-kt/konform/discussions/38#discussioncomment-8951572 and https://github.com/konform-kt/konform/issues/79#issuecomment-2027194364
I am closing this issue to have the issue tracker clear, but feel free to respond below if you are still interested in becoming an additional maintainer.