Coralie Mercier
Coralie Mercier
> My take would be to do as we do for /TR documents. Ie, no redirect. That would work for W3C Comm.
I have consulted with @deniak who confirms no redirect to the dated version of the process but using a proxy instead. Before doing so, I need to close the loop...
Hi all, @vivienlacourba and I met today (after he met yesterday with @plehegar) to decide on the following implementation details: 1. "this version" URI + "latest" URI to be edited...
> @koalie I think you mean this needs to happen not only in the Editor's Draft, but also in the published versions, is that right? Yes the editors draft should...
"Recognize / Recognition" has my strong preference over the other suggestions, including "admit / admission", to replace "acknowledge / acknowledgement".
> Thanks @koalie , can you explain why you prefer "Recognize / Recognition" over "Admit / Admission"? Yes, sorry. I find the former to be more neutral in meaning and...
And now that I've considered them too much, they carry no meaning anymore (to the extent that my preference which was strong earlier today is no longer strong)! If dictionaries...
I support Ivan's proposal.
> If so, are Community and Business Groups discouraged or prohibited from publishing documents with "W3C Editor's Draft" (in content / visuals) status? > > Should CGs and BGs be...
> If the text reference to "W3C Group" is intended to be any W3C group, I suggest clarifying this. The document already lists in the summary table (section 1) all...