KONNO Kazuhiro

Is it better to exclude the test for the time being? (Edit) Ah, it is not a specific test that fail with "Invalid JIT return address".

DDR is enabled in the nightly build at https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Build_JDK17_aarch64_mac_Nightly/68/, but core file is unavailable for this case.

No core file is available for java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 in the artifact of Test_openjdk18_j9_sanity.openjdk_aarch64_mac_Nightly/72/ above. There is a core file in aqa-tests/TKG/output_16543029449355/jdk_lang_1/work/java/lang/invoke/VarHandles/VarHandleTestMethodTypeInt/ instead. VarHandleTestMethodTypeInt test passed.

https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk11_j9_extended.system_aarch64_mac_Nightly_testList_2/78 ConcurrentLoadTest_5m_1 ``` LT stderr *** Invalid JIT return address 000000037FC08138 in 000000016B586678 ```

I ran JCL_Test_none_SCC_1 in my local environment, but I could not reproduce the failure. Not reproduced in https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Grinder/1135/ (30x runs), either.

I ran SharedClasses.SCM23.MultiCL_0 with the build from June 14 nightly job (https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Build_JDK18_aarch64_mac_Nightly/78/). 3 failures in 20 runs: https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Grinder/960/ ``` OpenJ9 - 920c3682ec9 OMR - cc14b3de1a4 ```

I also ran the testcase with June 13 nightly build (https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Build_JDK18_aarch64_mac_Nightly/77/). 1 failure in 20 runs: https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Grinder/961/ ``` OpenJ9 - 7c5c4148460 OMR - cf8ddbd1adc ```

5 failures in x20 Grinder job: https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Grinder_testList_0/130/consoleText, with June 10 nightly build (https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Build_JDK18_aarch64_mac_Nightly/76/). ``` OpenJ9 - 3d06b2f9c2c OMR - cf8ddbd1adc ``` There are two different reasons of the failures: [1st...

I started another Grinder job as https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Grinder/982/, using the June 9 nightly build.

4 failures in x20 run above.