Kai Mühlbauer

@kayarre Long time no hear. Do you still work on this one? I think that it would be a valuable addition to the wradlib codebase.

@kayarre Thanks! Finally I got along with the two github accounts ;-). True, it would be a great feature, so I'll leave the issue open, just in case someone is...

Just as a reminder, the UF format is described in all detail within the `IRIS Programming guide M211318EN-H` in Appendix C (pp. 127-131). So whoever is trying to get a...

This will be tackled in the new package [xradar](https://github.com/openradar/xradar) which wradlib will depend on in the future. Please open new discussion topics over there.

This still lacks sigmet test files of all products. If there is someone who can provide these data files to be made openly available, just contact wradlib maintainers.

Makes sense. This way we could get the indices of all DEM cells withing the beam (for all ranges) just by subscripting the wanted angle. But it is not clear...

OK, think I know what you mean. If we have all those DEM-Cells within one beam (azimuth, range, elevation), we "collapse" the range coordinates and get an array of (azimuth,...

This is implemented as example in [wradlib/beamblockage](https://github.com/wradlib/beamblockage) This would need to be generalized and added to wradlib codebase.

@pandasambit15 For this we would need radar volumes to create kind of fake RHI. What format is your radar data?

> Actually, you don't need RHI exactly, PPI cross sections and CAPPI cross sections can be utilized I think. That's why I referred to "fake" RHI. :grin: Do you need...