Katie McDonough
Return to this in terms of what we need for June workshop.
Noted here for future: also consider output as IIIF annotations or some other standard web annotation format (e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/) per convo/request from TNA.
More IIIF things to review/keep in mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEkT8BNDQv8 https://github.com/mejackreed/iiif-for-machine-learning-workshop
@rwood-97 @andrewphilipsmith Pinging you here so we could think about reviving the idea of sending out part of the MapReader code for review this spring with https://dhcodereview.github.io/. @kallewesterling is involved...
Yes, we were holding off since we just did the JOSS paper. I think it would be a good thing to do this w/text as you say.
Great. @andrewphilipsmith Would love to review these when you are ready to discuss options!
> * Are we expecting users to work through the tutorial using their own data or with sample data that we provide? For a tutorial, it will be with the...
> * I am now thinking maybe it is better to reproject the map sheets after retrieving them from NLS. What do you think? I think this is a good...
If I may suggests a variation on one of the community question for the list above based on the original slack post I made: - How do we make decisions...
@cakiki I can help document this dataset if useful.