Konrad Rudolph

Ah, yes, that’s implemented. In fact, [I’m working on a convenience wrapper](https://github.com/klmr/sys) (already using it internally), which allows the following code: ``` r sys = modules::import('sys') sys$run({ sys$print('Hello, world!') })...

For reference, relevant comment discussion about post-install hooks (to install the module manager script) here: http://stackoverflow.com/a/32035219/1968

Name clashes in public modules will be a concern. For reference, here’s a Google search on the subject: https://www.google.com/search?q=avoiding+package+name+clashes — showing that this is an active concern across languages and...

- **Con**: Github is a third party private corporation. Worst-case scenario, they go out of business tomorrow. Or they are made irrelevant by an emergent competitor. - **Pro**: Cons are...

@gaborcsardi I suspected as much but I know next to nothing about S4. That said, S4 classes have an attribute that specifies the associated package, don’t they? Could this be...

Thanks for your interest! > Would be great if there were a package. At the moment the module is unfinished and mostly at the prototype stage: I haven’t had time...

I really need to clean up this repository. The runnable examples are currently not in the `README` but rather in the [`examples.rmd` file](../blob/main/examples.md). But bear in mind that I’m working...

Potential solution to the problem with parametrised decorators: R seems to allow the following syntax: ``` r logged['log.txt'] %@% echo = function (msg) message(msg) ``` … i.e. using brackets instead...

To follow up on this, the above is parsed as ``` r ─ = ├─ %@% │ ├─ [] │ │ ├─ logged │ │ └─ "log.txt" │ └─ echo...

Might this be related to #3499?