Max Mulatz

😹 no worries. Just wanted to confirm: yes, that's the current ability and it should be right.

Hm, difficult edge case @mkalininait 🙈 Really "choosing" something like `none` does not really work, since it's not a valid conference ID and in fact not even an integer 😉...

Yes, sounds like a good plan @mkalininait 👍 So @juuh42dias some more things I would suggest to take into consideration here: * the "none"-conference (maybe we could call it `NullConference`,...

Sorry a) for the late response and b) for being so sloppy with my question @mkalininait 🙈 What I meant was: do we need a similar distinction for creating `ConferencePreference`...

I'd keep it. The "box on top of the activity stream" for instance that Carsten mentioned would be relatively fast and easy to add.

Moving this into the [Community Page](https://github.com/rails-girls-summer-of-code/rgsoc-teams/milestone/13) milestone, since this is an integral part of the whole "community page" project 😉 We will need some redefinitions for this though.

`1` and `3` still make sense I'd say (can you 👍/👎 @carpodaster?) For `2`: I'm pretty sure this is only out how city + country should be displayed in the...

Hm, reading @carpodaster's comment above ☝️ I think it should look like this: * we keep the `interested_in` string field with predefined values for better searchability (coach, etc.) * we...

Hm, I'm not sure if we're talking about the same thing here @branquinhoaa 🤔 In the current user edit form, picking the interests looks like this:

Ok, all good 💚 Sorry, my brain is kinda slow today, craving sleep and cookies ✌️