Claudio Guidi

Matthias is right. In Jolie a void is transformed into a null in JSON. I think it is the good default choice because there is a native correspondance between two...

The problem here is to have a valid transformation in both directions. If A is a JSON string and B a value tree in jolie, we should have: ``` jsonToValue(...

But in this case, it will be applied to every node. Maybe, we would like to have it only for some nodes.

I really do not like the idea to have a parameter in soap protocol for stating to ignore line feeds. I think the standard way should be ignoring the TEXT...

@bmaschio could you summarize me if this bug is solved or not? I tried to rebuild from the previous chat but I am a little bit confused. The problem you...

Yes. I am using an Ubuntu 20 (but it happens also with Ubuntu 18). It happens with both Java 8 and 11

Since it is just for a test, I think it is sufficient to suppress the warnings

It was a design choice. SOAP protocol in jolie has been introduced for dealing with web services that always provide a WSDL document for defining the interface. In a WSDL...

he problem is the management of mixed contents on the reception side. At the present, the implementation does not read the root value of a mixed content element. Indeed, if...

yes sorry, we should permit to define an inline interface: service twice( .request:int )( .result:int ) { result = request \* 2 }