Daniel Silverstone

> `man` program is not a part of `rustup` project. I don't know how we could manage > to do that unless you're willing to change MANPATH yourself. I think...

> At least on macOS, if you symlink `$TOOLCHAIN/share/man` as `~/.cargo/man`, then `man cargo` and all manpages work properly. Same problem as I mentioned above - it still isn't toolchain-sensitive....

> I offered this suggestion so that new users would be able to find the documentation with man. I think it's entirely do able with toolchan agnostic man pages for...

@glhrmv As of now, no there has been no consensus on an acceptable approach.

This kind of failure mode is something we attempted to fix with the downgrade of term to before the fallback terminfo thing. I wonder what we could do to output...

It's quite probable that this is true yes. ConPTY is not really an ANSI/VTxxx terminal which is part of the reason to want to shift to a more modern windows-aware...

So a lot of the issue is that terminal IO crates which expect to be able to deal in VT like commands tend to expect terminfo databases to be available...

ExFAT does not support filesystem-level links which are required for `rustup`'s proxy functionality as you surmised in your 'possible solutions'. In theory we could do without the links by creating...

It will never be "fixed" for exfat - for REFS if you have a fully-up-to-date OS and you **reformat** then you can get hard-link support. > Version ReFS 3.5 formatted...

This is an interesting idea. We're not able to trivially do this though as it would either involve OS-specific magic I'm not aware of; or else would require additional IO...