Kim Gräsman
Kim Gräsman
I looked up `CLASS ... WITH SYNTAX ...` in my ASN.1 specifications, and I frankly could not make sense of them. Do you have a link to somewhere I can...
Aaaw, my head hurts! Thanks, that was a good example. I'll save it for a day when I'm feeling perkier to think about whether it's implementable.
Sorry, time has been scarce for asn1ate. I'll try to get to this, but I can't promise when.
Thanks! I did some work on this this summer, but it's still lying around in a branch in one of my machines, and I don't think I ever finished. The...
Thanks for the report. I think the constraint is the problem in this case, there's definitely no support for `FROM` (which I think is a so-called alphabet constraint), but the...
I think you may be looking for `sema.Module.resolve_type_decl`. That unravels a chain of declarations back to the built-in type.
Hmm. It's not clear to me why you end up in `inline_component_type` rather than `inline_tagged_type`. Or is this code called _from_ `inline_tagged_type`? It's been too long since I thought about...
Interesting! I thought I'd implemented everything, but this must have slipped through. Would you be willing to take a stab at it? I can't promise when I'll get around to...
@apanloco Actually, I went to the test suite for verification, and I see at least a few `optional_argument` tests. Can you be more specific as to what's not working?
Thank you. I can see how that case might be problematic. And yes, I was also confused that there was no handling of `optional_argument`, but it probably falls through for...