Fix typos found by codespell

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Some typos are in user-visible strings and documentation, others are in code comments.

In the long term, I recommend fixing all typos, including those in code comments, because tools like codespell do not make a difference between code comments and documentation and user-visible strings.

I have left out typos in Contrib, they should be fixed upstream.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Not sure about _miscrosoft_docs_are_wrong → _microsoft_docs_are_wrong.

I believe it's OK because it's a private variable.

[sredna]

I have left out typos in Contrib, they should be fixed upstream

We own most of Contrib. If there is anything upstream I'll deal with it.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Fixed typos in Contrib too.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

I have left out Language files by the way.

There may be a few starting comments in English to fix, for example appropiate → appropriate: https://github.com/kichik/nsis/blob/268379229b0c1ef00603779890a28d0345ab0240/Contrib/Language%20files/Romanian.nsh#L8

Should I fix these comments?

Edit: That's actually the only typo in there; I have fixed it.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

And I just noticed part of the initial fixes, under Docs/src/halibut, must actually be fixed upstream.

Edit: I've sent a mail to the upstream maintainer. Edit: Ongoing discussion with the upstream maintainer: are both bulletted and bulleted (as in the Oxford dictionary) correct in UK English?

[sredna]

are both bulletted and bulleted (as in the Oxford dictionary) correct in UK English?

Bulletted only has 35k hits on Google vs millions for Bulleted. I'll take the fix.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

I see you have merged this change into the Subversion trunk. Thanks! Would it be worth adding a configuration file .codespellrc to silence false positives and simplify future maintenance?

[sredna]

I suppose that depends on how many false-positives you had to deal with and what the maintenance overhead is...

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

I am afraid nsis has many false positives:

$ codespell | wc -l
954
$ 

Most of them are in translation files that should be skipped. A .codespellrc file could drastically reduce that number by skipping these files. For example:

$ codespell --skip 'Language files' | wc -l
226
$ 

The can further reduce that number by ignoring some words:

$ codespell --skip 'Language files' --ignore-words-list parms | wc -l
133
$ 

The benefit of a .codespllrc is that developers get consistent results when running codespell locally.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

All fixes have been merged, thank you. I have added a .codespellrc file and fixed the last typos. Do you think it's worth merging?