Kyle Husmann

Oof, yeah, the remote references really put a wrench in things. I suppose downloading and verbosely including is the way to go, in the same way that if we add...

You bet! This current design is looking good! It looks almost identical to the flows I was imagining with a frictionless2 package, but combined into single package. I also like...

+1 -- When I heard the v2 announcement, I immediately assumed it would include breaking changes and was surprised to find it was going to be backwards compatible. Was v2...

I just realized "backwards compatibility" / "no breaking changes" has different levels/types of strict-ness, and I'm not clear where we stand: 1) An implementation designed for v2 spec should be...

Can we also include categorical / ordinal types as its own group? Right now they're implemented as constraints / extensions on other types, but I think deserve first-class discussion. (relevant...

Thanks for spearheading this issue @khughitt! I don't have much to add, except I like the idea of making it possible to create "views" into the collection! We might also...

I really like the idea of test / synthetic datasets to exercise frictionless features as well as provide examples. Regarding data generation, I have some bits of code for that...

Thanks for jumping into the conversation here! Coded categorical data is something I'm very interested in for frictionless as well. I think the functionality you're after here might be more...

(Tagging @pschumm and @peterdesmet for their thoughts as well)

Thanks for your clarifications. I think my biggest concern regarding the `codeList` approach is that it effectively duplicates a bunch of the functionality of `primaryKey` and `foreignKeys`, rather than extending...