Konrad Hinsen

I'd say it depends on how much "added value" is in the paper you want to replicate. If it's just a three-line script that calls your code, I don't see...

Thanks @MiWeiss for exploring this in depth! We are currently exploring very seriously the adoption of the [Open Journal platform](https://www.theoj.org/). That would add a few more checkmarks to your list...

I am not quite sure either that I understand the situation. There's a preprint that describes some software and demonstrates its use on some data. You say you cannot reproduce...

I completely agree. As a reviewer you are supposed to treat the submission you are reviewing as confidential, but once it is accepted and published, you are free to talk...

I agree. We need to keep some focus, and the key term is replication. I do see the problem though, and it looks quite reasonable to launch another journal like...

First of all, it's not a contest but a challenge. No competition, no losers, only winners! What follows is my personal view. Other @ReScience/editors may well have different ones, so...

@rougier I had some vague memories of this, but I couldn't find it in the author instructions... I'd say the only open question is minimal age. Judging from my personal...

@pdebuyl That's one of the questions we'd need to address, drawing on the experience of the ten-year challenge. The conclusion I have drawn so far from the challenge is that...

@rougier I wasn't that much thinking of Google Scholar, which is an issue we should tackle at the ReScience level. But preprint servers are gaining in popularity, and I see...

Thanks @rougier for the pointer! I see I was even mentioned in that discussion, and yet I never got notifications and thus never looked at the thread before.