Athan
@performant23 Yes, go for it. The one thing you need to do is ensure accessor array support. See `gcopy` and `gswap` for an idea.
@Rejoan-Sardar Thanks for opening this issue. One question I have is which of the above distributions are included in SciPy? For each of the distributions, it would be good to...
@adityacodes30 Do you have specific examples regarding what you have in mind?
@adityacodes30 Not opposed to pursuing things, but it would be good to see some concrete API proposals. `base64` encode/decode utilities could be useful; `protobuf` we are less likely to support....
@performant23 That'd be great! Thanks for volunteering to work on this!
C) Returning an object with real and imaginary components, yes, that should work, and it's what we do for unary math functions. See https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/1fb4994e369f396c81b96787e89cb379c015ab29/lib/node_modules/%40stdlib/math/base/napi/unary/src/main.c#L209. Note, however, you should follow our...
@performant23 FYI: for returning a complex number-like object, I added macro support to simplify JS value creation: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/tree/develop/lib/node_modules/%40stdlib/napi/create-complex-like. You'll need to merge in the latest `develop` to use. You can...
This should hopefully eliminate the need for (C), as you can use the macro instead.
Hmm...yeah, I hadn't thought about the completer controlling the terminal output. My initial thought was escape sequences, but then you are right, I can see how that might be an...
For IPython, looks like they use [jedi](https://github.com/davidhalter/jedi) for auto-completion. In Node.js, fuzzy-matching is not supported.