Flynn
Flynn
Thanks for the callout! We'll take a look – I'm curious whether this just amounts to following `serving` instead of `ready` or if there's more to it than that. 😓
Hey @andrewdinunzio, correct me if I'm wrong here, but wouldn't the check just be a noop with the tainting webhook?
Quick update: yup, we're still working on this!
@hatfarm and @Abrishges, probably best to split your case into its own discussion so we can separate issues of scale from issues of memory...
Let's unstale this: we actually do want to get into this.
@cpotteck has expressed interest in working on this! 🙂
@candita, I just made a bunch of copyediting-type suggestions for consistency in how we refer to various things. Please don't take that as in any way indicative of a lack...
@JadKHaddad, many thanks! and many apologies for letting this linger. 🤦♂️ This looks nice! I've updated this to the latest `main`, but I have two other requests: 1. Can you...
The example you added looks great, thanks! I think adding the job also sounds like a great idea.
Oh, whoops – any chance you can fix the DCO for your latest, too? 😅