Kevin Cai

s1: if use `com.a.A`, will `protoc` recognize it as correct message type? After all, the .proto will be used for both java code and c++ code. s2: what if `b.proto`...

Even with solution 2, putting aside name conflict in different protobuf packages, jprotobuf generates wrong java code b.proto ``` syntax="proto2"; import public "a.proto"; package b; option java_package = "com.b"; message...

@jhunters not sure if more information is needed from me?

Looks like test case should be changed or improved to reflect serviceId type change.

appended the description information to the build host. An example is as the follows ``` root@f221cc40947e:~/starrocks/output# ./fe/bin/show_fe_version.sh Build version: build_id Commit hash: 1bd2705 Build type: RELEASE Build time: 2024-02-28 08:52:43...

give up backport to branch-2.5

the location is specified with `s3://` is the correct one, we are taking google cloud storage as a variant of s3-compatible storage.

can you have a try with both BE and CN enabled in the cluster, I doubt there is a bug that causes the creation failure if no BE there.

that is, add the following snippet into your cr yaml ``` starRocksBeSpec: image: starrocks/be-ubuntu:latest replicas: 1 requests: cpu: 1 memory: 4Gi limits: cpu: 1 memory: 8Gi ```

> Since we use ArgoCD for deployments, the operator is NOT installed in the starrocks namespace but rather in cluster-components namespace. It seems to start up and the starrocks clusters...