kevaundray

> Hello, > > > > You are effectively saying that you don't trust that `ssz_serialize()` is a bijective function. And that instead we should handle the Fiat-Shamir in the...

> > Should something ever change with the way clients implement the necessary methods on a user defined struct for ssz, the cryptography will not need to be re-analysed, for...

Closing as #3030 and #3038 have been merged

Closing as we now have monomorphisation

Closing as we decided not to move forward with this

Adding #2629 for when this Epic is nearing completion

@TomAFrench what is the status of this issue?

Adding a note: We should remove the `ToBits` OPCODE since we want it as a directive. It seems to be getting used in the evaluate_opcode method in SSA. I am...

This has now been removed and moreover acvm is no longer in this repo

This has now grown stale