Martin Paucot

Hey! I went touching some grass those last days but I finally got a bit of time to resolve the last discussions of this review. We should be good!

> I don't know the timeline of release for this, but is there a way to test this already, even if it isn't published anywhere? Hey @iffa, I am planning...

@Maniktherana thanks a lot for the review! @drwpow can we merge this?

Hi @ViktorPontinen! Could you provide an OpenAPI schema that result in the same behavior so we can reproduce your issue?

This is a requirement as per the `@tanstacl/react-query` library and not related to `openapi-react-query` itself but as this requirement seems to impact a lot of people I'm happy to accept...

> Just to clarify for the documentation - does this only occour when the client is defined in another file than where we use the query? No this will always...

I think it is a good idea to rely on tanstack-query helper types as much as possible. When I originally wrote this library I went straight to the point but...

You are right, we should be providing parameters to the mutationKey, the same way we do with queryKey. Happy to review a PR for that!

A feature that is not implemented in openapi-react-query is the ability to provide parameters in `useMutation` that become optional when using `mutate`. In this case, it would be possible to...

@tommymarshall @jungwoo3490 this pull request does not seem to be ready to be merged as tests are still failing. And with the latest changes it now has conflicts with main...