Ken Sipe
Ken Sipe
@ANeumann82 > Regarding the error handling - as we allow the top-level repo to overwrite operators, I think a failure to load one of the includes may be ok. There...
@gerred it was a need expressed by internal staff needing to have a private repo but also wanting full access to updates and changes in the community repo
well done @ANeumann82
@Gilbert88 I'm trying to understand this request better... 1. It is confusing to refer to this as "blocking" a couple of things... as the prerequisite step of creating a namespace...
We had a good zoom meeting... in it we reduced the scope of this Issue to KUDO creating 1 namespace (not multi-namespaces). The request is: 1) kudo should create 1...
the question on type is important to vet IMO.... if we are talk about something someone would pass to a CLI (like path, or backup name or... ) these seem...
this came up in the community meeting today... there seems to be some agreement that this should not be handled as proposed... it was suggested that we bring back PlanExecution...
I would also propose change the name... "Resettable Parameters" seems prescriptive..... It seems more like enable arguments to imperative operations or... plan parms... plan args?
needed for private repo
yep.. I thought that was what was communicated... but yeah!