kenmcd

> The problem was a stray parameter that was messing up the style linking (I'm not sure how). What did you find? I checked and did see the issue, so...

Hmmmm... quite odd. I do not see any STAT table in the Normal/Regular or the Exp/SmBold (although they could have one). Since this change has fixed the issue, I really...

You know I love a good mystery... :-) I saw nothing wrong with the static fonts style-linking so I am intrigued. It could just be an InDesign issue. This only...

> I did a ttx dump on the whole static otf directory and found no STAT table in any of them. Didn't check the ttf, though. OK.

The Cantarell VF font only has named instances for Thin (100), Light (200), Regular (400), Bold (700, at 600.4), and ExtraBold (800). On the website they are displaying text using...

Hmmmm... `gid 1` is the `space` (the Space character which is of course empty) `glyph 2` is the `nbspace` (No-break space) which has the `space` as a component (linking their...

Note: GF may have an issue with the changed vertical metrics. What you did makes sense to me (and others). But GF is always concerned about re-flow from metrics changes....

> thanks @kenmcd. I am aware and concerned about this as well. I actually changed the vertical metrics _back_ to what is currently on GF. `winAscent` and `winDescent` match GF,...

> If I changed the name I'd be able to change many other things that I would like to, if not for existing usage %s. Specifically the way the round...

My guess is you are using the TTF fonts. On my phone at the moment so I cannot check the fonts...but Some printer drivers cannot handle nested components - and...