Kelvin Jiang

Results 15 comments of Kelvin Jiang

Hi, These results were extracted from a preprocessed version of Freebase, so we did not use SPARQL queries. Kelvin

The dataset includes the Freebase MIDs that directly corresponds to entities in Freebase. Also, a subset of Freebase (preprocessed) has been linked in the README.

Unfortunately, I was not the one that worked on preprocessing Freebase, so I can't provide you with some sample SPARQL queries. Sorry about that.

I'm not sure what you mean by format, but the object node in each Freebase triple is always the answer to the question.

This dataset should be used to evaluate your KBQA results, there is no need to evaluate it. It was previously labelled and assessed by human annotators.

If you want to get from EntityMid to EntityName, use the `type.object.name` predicates within the Freebase subset. They map a Freebase MID to its name, and you can filter its...

Yes, should be, this is all straight from the original Freebase data dumps. Therefore, it may be possible for some unpopular Freebase MIDs to be missing labels.

Theoretically yes, if they didn't have a label, our algorithm would not have been able to pick them up.

The `TopicEntityMid` refers to the Freebase MID for some entity in the question, not the answer. Instead, you probably want to evaluate your model's performance with the final `AnswersMid` and...

No, mediator nodes should not have names (like `m.010gj6wc type.object.name "Prague"@en`), even in the Freebase subset.