Kelsey Gilbert

Ok so no change needed?

WGSL 2024-05-14 Minutes * Resolved to validate out

Mozilla thinks that we should differentiate the "sorry we failed" case of e.g. underlying Adapter loss with the "you violated the only-one-created-device" rule, where we would prefer the latter to...

WGSL 2025-02-18 Minutes * JB: As far as community is concerned, WGPU has an implementation of this which Bevy wanted. Crucial for nanite. Shipped in WGPU v24. Pretty desirable. People...

WGSL 2024-11-19 Minutes * Milestone? * KG: M1? * DN: Maybe yes? Likely to implement 2025q1. * MW,JB,RC: +1 * KG: It’s a proposal, should we land it? * JB:...

WGSL 2024-07-30 Minutes * KG: Want to reopen the discussion about when errors happen. When does the shader make contact with the API; that’s pipeline creation time. * * AB:...

I would consider this an implementation choice that we can't necessarily guarantee that we live up to, and so I would avoid MUST for something like this as well.

I believe this is one of the harsh realities, unfortunately. We will try to avoid it but we can't guarantee it.

If continue/continuing is just syntactic sugar, we can desugar as: ``` var i : i32 = 0; var j : i32 = len - 1; loop { if (!i <...

``` loop { if (x) { a; if (!y) { b; } } c; } ```