Kamil Braun

@Flou21 I'd try the following: - stop the .6 node. It keeps trying to bootstrap, you should stop this automatic process for now - there are some leftovers from previous...

Meanwhile, @mykaul since the root cause of the failure is a reader timeout inside repair code `WARN 2024-05-06 22:17:59,480 [shard 0:stre] repair - Failed to read a fragment from the...

> @kbr-scylla @piodul This is how it will look with current changes and with changes from pipeline merged https://jenkins.scylladb.com/job/scylla-staging/job/xtrey/job/scylladb_test.py/35/ I see  The "failed test logs" link...

Started rebuild hope it will work: https://jenkins.scylladb.com/job/scylla-staging/job/xtrey/job/scylladb_test.py/38/

> Started rebuild hope it will work: https://jenkins.scylladb.com/job/scylla-staging/job/xtrey/job/scylladb_test.py/38/ It didn't run any tests?

Looks very good (and a huge improvement over current state I think) but there are some problems: https://jenkins.scylladb.com/job/scylla-staging/job/xtrey/job/scylladb_test.py/39/testReport/junit/(root)/test_multidc/test_putget_2dc_with_rf_nodes_list0_1__debug_1/ -> click failed_test_logs, we get https://jenkins.scylladb.com/job/scylla-staging/job/xtrey/job/scylladb_test.py/39/artifact/testlog/x86_64/debug/failed_test/test_putget_2dc_with_rf[nodes_list0-1].debug.1/ -> there are two test log...

I like the results now: https://jenkins.scylladb.com/job/scylla-staging/job/xtrey/job/scylladb_test.py/46/

Also needs rebase (after @temichus's PR went in)

> Why would CL=ALL work? Sorry, I think I made a mistake. With RF=3 + CL=ALL, we would calculate that 3 natural replicas are needed, (the calculation doesn't take into...

> I added an API for that in https://github.com/scylladb/scylladb/commit/190bdc39fd27d097e334b18e2c2b40d63149e18a (not merged yet). Looks suspiciously similar to "wait for gossip to settle"... which we disabled...