Konstantin Boyarinov

> @kboyarinov you may take a look to #1239 There is some similar approach from @rarutyun > > * this file: https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDPL/pull/1239/files#diff-deed20001ff532923c71880283f45817ed065a09752a00c0da1192ee65655fef For me these PRs and approaches are orthogonal....

> I do not have much to add, but I have installed GCC 9/10 and have confirmed that the following program does not compile on the main branch with gcc9/gcc10...

> I have the following understanding of the cases of handling incompatibility between TBB backend in libstdc++ v9/v10 and modern TBB, oneTBB, when the later is used: > > *...

> > Could you please describe the difference between bullets 2 and 3 because for me both execution and cstddef are STL headers:) > > Sorry, I confused you by...

Committed the simplified version of the patch, proposed by @akukanov. @akukanov @MikeDvorskiy @adamfidel @dmitriy-sobolev, could you please take a look one more time?

@pavelkumbrasev @fdiedler I think in theory it is possible to add a hash set container on top of `concurrent_hash_map` engine. Could you please explain your use case for such case...

@sanvila, could you please tell us more about the CPU you are running on? It would help to better reproduce and identify any possible issues. My guess is that failures...

@per-mathisen-arm, thanks for submitting this issue. Since `` is a C++ Standard Library header, having another `` in the users include path results in undefined behavior. It can also break...

I have tried to test the implementation locally and found that it enables the CTAD only for copy/move constructors of `blocked_rangeNd`. I had an idea on how can CTAD for...

> > I have tried to test the implementation locally and found that it enables the CTAD only for copy/move constructors of `blocked_rangeNd`. I had an idea on how can...