Kaxil Naik

@tatiana has another recommendation around "safety" package

Astro Runtime `6.0.0-alpha1` image is out where I will do the mapping

WIP diff at https://github.com/astronomer/astro-sdk/compare/main...aip-48-mapping Branch at https://github.com/astronomer/astro-sdk/tree/aip-48-mapping ---- ----

Both Table and File object have been mapped with 6.0 alpha2 runtime image but the code needs to be cleaned up

PR: https://github.com/astronomer/astro-sdk/pull/786 **Pending items**: - [x] Add inlets and outlets on all operators - [ ] Add docs

Another PR: https://github.com/astronomer/astro-sdk/pull/808 Only doc PR is pending now

I will create separate task for docs so that I can close this out

Also credits to @tatiana she brought it up first in https://github.com/astronomer/astro-sdk/pull/384#discussion_r878956136

There are some caveats though as listed in https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/runtime_troubles.html#future-annotations-import-pep-563. @uranusjr Is it safe to use this or should we wait till we drop support for Python 3.7 and 3.8?

@utkarsharma2 This one is an "epic" that encompasses several docs issues as listed in the PR description so we don't need to add story points to this task