Kaxil Naik

Results 165 comments of Kaxil Naik

> And I do not think we need a spike. For me it's just "common sense" (pun intended). Determining what is shared is as important and part of the spike...

>I think you misunderstood my description I think only task-sdk should be client and it should be "all" you need to run client. Even if it means duplication of some...

> One of the problems we are going to have is "triggerer" and "dag processor". Because effectively both of them have to have both "core" parts and "task-sdk" parts installed....

>I think we should have completely separate Executor Base distribution - and executor distributions should depend on it as well as on providers/task.sdk. I think this also can be achieve...

> Yeah - but you can't solve the knot "partially" if you do not know how you are going to solve https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/51552. It is part of the same parent GH...

Yup, no disagreement on that >Sure. But I am telling that splitting dag-processor and triggerer out of the common is necessary and you need to know how your target split...

Merging this, one of the failures around k8s test that took longer than an hour looks like a transient one: ``` Progress: airflow-python-3.9-v1.28.13 Error during running tests for Python 3.9,...

> @shahar1 @kaxil Could one of you test if this fixes it please? Yup, works now

We should add something for the [public API change](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/stable-rest-api-ref.html) too. API v1 won't work anymore. Those are being changed as part of AIP-84 to a new FastApi based app. GitHub...