Yusuke Kawasaki
Yusuke Kawasaki
Thank you for the PR. `Bufferish` is one of the most of complex parts of the library. I have had a plan to make it simpler and smarter, but it...
Yes, I've been working for it. I'll retry to merge it in this month.
I'm sorry to the late response. I was pretty busy for those months. I'm currently working for Issue #76. I don't think it will take a long time to wait...
Interesting. The library could have an option `strip_undef`, `ignore_undef` or something. The msgpack has `null` but no `undefined` vlaue. The library encodes JS's `undefined` as msgpack's `null` to follow the...
@lauhon Let me clarify the issue. Are you encoding an Array filled with integer numbers but not a Buffer object or an Uint8Array? ``` encode(new Array(165, 190, 64, 103, 149,...
Thanks! I could understand that you're encoding a Buffer instance or Uint8Array. What is the problem you face then? Any msgpack libraries do not have compression feature such as Deflate/gzip...
@acoreyj Let me know the command to reproduce the message above. I have never faced the problem on compiling it with browserify though.
> Although is there a reason that your browser field in the package.json doesn't just point to the bundle in dist? No reason but just missing, I guess.
`usemap` is an option for decoder. Set option `usemap: true` on decoder-side but not on encoder-side. ```js var options = {codec: msgpack.createCodec({usemap: true})}; var decoded = msgpack.decode(data, options); assert.equal(true, decoded...