Katie Gengler

> As an alias, which means supporting the `hash` AND an alias like `obj`, why we would do the job TWICE ? Because adding an alias to `obj` is a...

Ed: Feels like a design gap that users won't get the experience unless they have the correct editor support. If we did that, this becomes an implementation detail of the...

Open question for Ember Data types: (from @runspired) What is acceptable to reach stable? Do we need to reduce the surface area of files to match the JS Files that...

We decided to move this RFC along with #998, #999, #997 into FCP to accepted today at the RFC meeting assuming this has the same details as in #997

Moving to the Exploring stage requires the consensus of the relevant teams. See :https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs#exploring I am removing the label.

Would like to codify a testing story where Ember used as library without having to have a separate app.

The tutorial does not use `ember test` but does use `ember test -s` -- do we want to make this `npm run test:ember -s`?

I think there are parts of the workflow that rely upon this not running for all directories. It needs some testing.

I think it's not unreasonable to merge PRs that don't touch RFCs without green CI, until we work this out. None of the CI jobs do anything for changes not...

@sandstrom Newly opened RFCs will have a label of `S-Proposed`. There are some [quick links to filter the list in the README](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs#quick-links-for-pull-requests-for-proposed-and-advancing-rfcs). But, I suggest that you should also be...