karthink
karthink
> How do I make sure I'm using the latest stable release of gptel when I'm on the Purcell-emacs config? I don't know how Purcell-emacs handles Emacs package versioning, so...
> Understood, will try to repro on latest developer version with vanilla emacs and get back to you. You can continue to use purcell's configuration, that's not an issue. Please...
> Is there a repository of 'working gptel > tools' that i can try out and build upon? Re > https://karthinks.com/software/tool-use-with-gptel-looking-for-testers/ You can try https://github.com/skissue/llm-tool-collection for tools, or use [gptel-agent](https://github.com/karthink/gptel-agent)....
> Understood, will try to repro on latest developer version with vanilla emacs and > get back to you. @pokho do you have an update on this issue?
Added support for the `GPTEL_TOOLS` property in Org mode buffers, and per-file state in Markdown etc. Tools should be saved/restored along with the backend, model, system message etc when saving/restoring...
Does setting gptel-include-tool-results do what you want?
I'm not sure I follow. I read your posts three times, and this is the closest to what I understood: When the LLM proposes a function call, the arguments of...
> @karthink My apologies for being unclear. No worries -- I think the problem is me, because I still don't follow exactly what you mean. It sounds fine until I...
> The overall flow I have in mind: > > ``` > - :confirm handler call > -> apply edit of old_string to new_string in a temporary file output file...