Group Cluster Failover flags into a single command flagSet
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently, there are an increasing number of parameters in the generic component of karmada-controller-manager. It might be a good idea to group these parameters according to the functions or controllers they handle.
Let's first take Cluster Failover as an example to create a template, and then we will gradually group and process other parameters in the following sections.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
NONE
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from xishanyongye-chang. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
Summary of Changes
Hello @XiShanYongYe-Chang, I'm Gemini Code Assist[^1]! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on a cleanup effort by refactoring the configuration options related to cluster failover. The primary goal is to enhance code clarity and maintainability by renaming the relevant struct and file, and by organizing its command-line flags into a distinct group. This change ensures that the configuration for cluster failover is explicitly named and presented, making it easier for developers and users to understand and manage.
Highlights
- Refactoring: The
FailoverOptionsstruct and its associated file have been renamed toClusterFailoverOptionsandcluster_failover.gorespectively, to provide clearer naming and intent. - Flag Grouping: Command-line flags related to cluster failover configurations are now grouped under a dedicated
cluster failoverflag set, improving organization and user experience. - Codebase Update: All references and usages of the old
FailoverOptionshave been updated to the newClusterFailoverOptionsacross the codebase, including in controller setup, validation, and testing.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with :thumbsup: and :thumbsdown: on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
[^1]: Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.
:warning: Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.
Codecov Report
:x: Patch coverage is 35.71429% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 46.39%. Comparing base (d8473e1) to head (1589cb3).
| Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| cmd/controller-manager/app/controllermanager.go | 0.00% | 7 Missing :warning: |
| ...controller-manager/app/options/cluster_failover.go | 66.66% | 2 Missing :warning: |
| :exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6905 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 46.39% 46.39% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 697 697
Lines 47764 47766 +2
==========================================
- Hits 22162 22161 -1
- Misses 23932 23936 +4
+ Partials 1670 1669 -1
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests | 46.39% <35.71%> (-0.01%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
/gemini review
/retest
/cc @RainbowMango