Kanit Wongsuphasawat
Kanit Wongsuphasawat
Would the faceting issue be a problem for [violin](https://vega.github.io/vega/examples/violin-plot/)/[density](https://vega.github.io/vega/examples/probability-density/) plot as well? Note that I'm adding a separate issue for violin / density plot in https://github.com/vega/vega-lite/issues/3442, and keep this issue...
@zening just mentioned today that we can "hack" and use contour to highlight point as a way to annotate plots too. (She will post a screenshot.)
Thinking more, I think fixing this in Vega makes more sense.
Adding `unionWith` is another workaround, in the meantime. ```json { "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega-lite/v6.json", "description": "A simple bar chart with embedded data.", "data": { "values": [ {"a": "A", "b": 28}, {"a": "B",...
> Property Naming: Are the proposed names consistent with existing conventions? we have `config.background`, so I think using the full word "background" would be more consistent than just `bg-`. >...
Thanks for asking. This will likely be a part of v2.x release.
RE: default interaction, let's create a new issue (#1658) to discuss that since it's going a little off topic here.
Given that we will follow semantic versioning, it is probably more accurate to say "very early versions of 2.x minor release".
I don't think it will be as simple as adding `interactive: true` -- as it will be totally diverging from how interactions are defined by specifying `selection` and applying them...
https://tech.shutterstock.com/rickshaw/ is another library that has some support for this.