Mathieu Poumeyrol
Mathieu Poumeyrol
Are we really running native arm64 here ? not emulated x86_64 over an arm64 system ? Can you run a `tract kernels` on `0.21.8` and copy paste the output ?
May relate to the re-opening of #1022 .
Just wanted to say, it is a bit weird that your mac is not on arm64 by default. As for x86 emulated on an arm64 mac not working, it's an...
* We are interested in Element wise operations: * result is independent of tensor geometry (only accept scalar operations, no broadcasting of tensors) * output = f(x) for x in...
1. this is not an active topic for us 2. yes
You should try to produce a square-ish mat * mul (m=n) implementation, and also a mat * vec (n=1). You should be able leverage the tests available for the others...
Depending on your familiarity of efficient mat mul implemetation, you may want to check out the sonos tech blog articles (https://tech-blog.sonos.com/posts/the-anatomy-of-efficient-matrix-multipliers/ and part 3). For tile sizes, I would probably...
Thanks for your contribution. But... tract has immutable tensor semantics, so it does not need a copy operator. I must say I fail to see why NNEF needs one to...
Mmm... So should we map it to a cast operator instead ? I'm saying this knowing tract cast semantics are weak: half of them are conversions and the other half...
Maybe I misunderstood. When you mentioned the quantization, I guessed that the copy operator was helping with converting from one conversion to another (as defined per a graph.quant file). Did...