Kai Kewley

Actually, I'll leave it open until it's fixed in a release. Cheers.

Thanks for letting us know @spiros 👍

Hi @Eneuman, We don't have any code or example of how to classify post coordinated expressions yet. I think this would be a helpful feature for a growing number of...

@Eneuman, I think I need to check your requirements. There is a more complete explanation of the Necessary Normal Form and how to generate it [here](https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/display/DOCOWL/2.5.+Generating+Necessary+Normal+Form+Relationships+from+the+OWL+Refsets). Creating the NNF for...

Hi @Eneuman, Happy New Year. Yes this looks sensible. We plan to add incremental classification functionality to the OWL Toolkit and Classification Service this year with work currently planned for...

Yes that's no problem. In fact adding the expressions to the Ontology would cause interesting problems and would not be supported, at least not initially.

We would love to have all our tools containerised but it has not been a priority for the internal team because we have no use case for it at the...

Only active concepts will be translated to OWL classes. I expect you will find that there are 332,210 concepts with an active value of 1 in the sct2_Concept_Full_US1000124_20170301.txt file.

The remaining discrepancy is probably due to attributes. In SNOMED CT attributes (relationship types) are represented as concepts in the concept file, however in OWL these do not become Classes...

Hi @nagyo, thanks for reaching out. My initial thought it that the documentation has an incorrect assumption because we have been told that the values in the concrete relationships table...