kaibocai

once PR https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-java-worker/pull/634 is ready, it can be utilized as DI hook. @patriot1burke please review above PR and give any feedback you would have. (Feedback from expert like you helps...

> @kaibocai #634 is still allocating the function class in JavaMethodExecutorImpl. Would want to delegate function class instantiation to another framework (Quarkus or Spring). That's right, I didn't notice the...

/azp run

Hi @patriot1burke , just want to confirm that for Quarkus to work for azure function, is it a must that function class need to be created/registered by/to [Quarkus bean container...

Hi @patriot1burke , sorry for late reply (not seeing the notification of your comment), this PR https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-java-worker/pull/634 didn't build cause we haven't update necessary dependencies, which is also required for...

> @kaibocai Saw that your 'middleware" changes made it into master! :) > > Has this version of the java worker been released? When will it be available to use...

close this PR as PR https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-java-worker/pull/667 is merged

Hi @M-Mendonca , can you share how you `IMessageReceiver` class is defined and any document you use to create it? The binding name should be `@BindingName("MessageReceiver")`, please let me know...

Haven't get response for more than 1 month. Will close the issue. Please reopen it if you still have the issue.

Hi @svangeti , @Andycharalambous , thanks for reaching out. Are you still get this issue. If yes can you provide a repo that we can used to reproduce the issue....