k0001

> I expect you'll get into trouble with, e.g., a 2-byte AD `fo` and 4-byte text `obar`, and a 4-byte AD `foob` and 2-byte text `ar`, under the same key,...

> Got it, that sounds more reasonable. Great. Thanks for checking it out. > That said, this requires resistance to related-key attacks, and I don't know whether anyone conjectures that...

Since `cabal new-*` embraces the idea of multiple packages per project, it would be great if we could have something like [standalone-haddock](https://documentup.com/feuerbach/standalone-haddock) building a top-level documentation for our project encompassing...