Kathryn Doering
Kathryn Doering
comment from @k-doering-NOAA on 2019-12-03: A warning seems like a good idea. I just looked at the manual section on bin compression and think it is informative about how bin...
comment from @iantaylor-NOAA on 2019-12-04: I support the plan for the warning. I also should confess that I'm unconvinced of the benefits of tail compression in general. Some analysis of...
comment from @iantaylor-NOAA on 2020-03-03: This request seems connected to closed issue #16273 which discusses the reporting of fleet-specific likelihood components in MCMC (which may require additional refinement) as well...
comment from @RickMethot on 2020-03-03: Thanks Ian. I think what Cole wants is the info that is found now in report.sso in tables like Fif_LenComp and Index_2. But imagine a...
comment from @kellijohnson-NOAA on 2020-03-03: Thanks Ian for thinking of the hake assessment. We do in fact re-run each saved sample with bias adjustment ramp = 1.0 to generate a...
comment from @RickMethot on 2020-03-03: Kelli and Ian, I think we need a new issue for this topic of re-running posteriors to get full report. I had no idea that...
comment from @k-doering-NOAA on 2020-03-03: @cole.monnahan, tagging you in case you want to provide feedback on this issue.
comment from cole.monnahan on 2020-03-03: kathryn.doering wrote: > @cole.monnahan, tagging you in case you want to provide feedback on this issue. kelli.johnson wrote: > Thanks Ian for thinking of the...
comment from @RickMethot on 2020-03-03: Thanks Cole. Ican see how this could enable such detailed investigations. For MCEVAL, we certainly want this file to be written to in append mode....
comment from @iantaylor-NOAA on 2020-03-03: I think that a good way to move forward with this would be to test the approach on a simple model with the new output...