jyn

cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103673, which will raise the NDK version to r25b. I'm not sure which API version that corresponds to. I *think* the only impact that should have is that this...

@KittyBorgX thanks for looking at it :) the first step is to cherry-pick the changes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101711 to the latest master commit. Then you'll need to fix the bug Mark...

My suggestion would be to re-land #107956 almost as-is, except with this feature disabled when a custom `build.rustc` is set.

> No, I'm sorry. Please provide feedback. Specific feedback, @tshepang. I am certain that this is an improvement. @mightyiam This is not an acceptable tone to use with people volunteering...

We are not obligated to merge your code. The time you have spent so far has no impact on whether or not we merge your code. The only reason we...

> @JohnTitor said this on the other pull request, but I'll repeat it here: > > > > It was written carefully. I'm certain that it's a significant improvement. >...

The burden of proof is on you to show that it is an improvement, not on us to find fault with it.

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99102 has been merged :)

This was already documented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1405. Is there any way we can make this more clear?

Given the work on split-debuginfo, would it be possible to package the debuginfo in a separate file? That would avoid having to ship a second copy of the standard library.