jyn

FWIW I would be happy with just running rustdoc and not showing the rendered docs. That would be enough to show ICEs and most bugs.

Same for lang items in core: ``` error[E0152]: found duplicate lang item `sized` --> src/lib.rs:14:1 | 14 | trait X {} | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: the lang item is...

I'm interested in working on this. I'll try to get around to it this weekend.

Oh, I don't know what github uses on their backend. I was thinking playground could hardcode something. Let me know if I should do a binary search on the URL...

> can this occur in the middle of things like identifiers, as in: is `foo\_bar` expected to produce foobar (if _ was a newline)? Yes, that's right.

> Addendum: It's not just `\LF`, it's `\\\n[[:c_whitespace:]]*`, for whatever C considers as being valid whitespace. This is not correct, it only deletes the newline and backslash.

> Happy path here (no b"\\\n" found) could just re-borrow the original &str in its entirety without having to copy anything. I don't know what is the statistical % of...

Finally got a response about licensing, other tools already use the licenses so it shouldn't be a problem: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/Is.20there.20an.20approved.20HTML.20parser.3F/near/312418703 Mark did suggest that this doesn't necessarily need to be part...

Note that just looking at the comment is a regression compared to the current behavior - right now `rustlings watch` doesn't proceed to the next exercise unless the current one...

fixed link: https://hackmd.io/daPDR2Q7Ryey0Q2gqgSM2w