jyn

These are the current broken links for the rust-lang/rust repo (after running a full `x.py doc`): ``` Found invalid urls in std/collections/btree_set/struct.BTreeSet.html: Fragment #insert-and-complex-keys at std/collections/btree_set/index.html does not exist! Found...

After fixing bugs in both deadlinks and rust-lang/rust, these are the remaining broken links: ``` > deadlinks build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/doc/ Found invalid urls in std/collections/btree_set/struct.BTreeSet.html: Fragment #insert-and-complex-keys at std/collections/btree_set/index.html does not exist!...

~~Hmm, I cloned the repo and ran `cargo +nightly build` and it works fine from there. Not sure why it behaves different when used in a library.~~ I was compiling...

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25561137/how-to-write-a-custom-attribute-that-injects-code-into-a-function#25563608 suggests using the `syntax` crate instead, not sure if that's a workable solution.

> try to map only packs that actually have objects we are interested in, avoiding to map all by default I think that would be the ideal solution for docs.rs....

> No no :), it doesn't. All it does it use the high-level git2 API to fetch and to diff. ❤️ > In my perfect naive world, it can do...

I've also seen this happening in rust-lang/rust, it completely ignores changes. BACON_LOG=debug doesn't show any output for me.

Hmm, this is tricky in two ways: 1. Technically you can include any file with `include_bytes!`, even temporary or generated files 2. Use a whitelist of patterns is too coarse,...

@WaffleLapkin those types aren't using interior mutability, they're using unsafe. Writing to a `*mut T` when you only have a `&T` is undefined behavior. So flowistry can just treat them...

@WaffleLapkin ah, sure. But I think it's ok to support interior mutability without first supporting raw pointers, the second will be much more difficult (it probably will require whole-program analysis).