jwt27
jwt27
Rebased to fix merge conflict - no changes.
> Would it be simpler to disable printf format checking on DJGPP? If that is preferred then I can do that. However @t8m already approved these changes so I presume...
> Merged to master. Thank you. Thanks! > Leaving this open — do we want this for 3.0, 3.1? I suppose it's only necessary for master, since that is where...
Sure, I'll look into it.
Sure, I suppose I can do that. I also want to ping @jmgdjgpp and @gvanem - I see they have submitted patches here before, and I know they are much...
Force-push to re-trigger the build. With #19322 merged, everything should work now. I also added a configure flag to disable atomics, which is necessary for `-march=i386`. Maybe that should go...
> > I also added a configure flag to disable atomics, which is necessary for > > `-march=i386`. Maybe that should go in the default configuration for djgpp. > >...
Force-pushed again to re-trigger build - all should work now.
Done, thanks for the reminder.
Thanks! I hope this will help keep the djgpp port alive and up to date.