jwortmann

Results 216 comments of jwortmann

I would say everything you described is expected. Have you read my [previous comment](https://github.com/sublimelsp/LSP/issues/2608#issuecomment-2917093371)?

Okay, sorry I didn't want to sound unpolite. But your code snippet where you have the settings put inside a `"settings"` key with the description about "the server-specific one" sounded...

It seems like the LSP server is implemented via [tabby-agent](https://github.com/TabbyML/tabby/tree/main/clients/tabby-agent) (https://www.npmjs.com/package/tabby-agent) and it is a server (the first one?) with support for `textDocument/inlineCompletion` 🚀 This client currently doesn't have support...

Update: it seems that running tabby without an authorization token is already supported. The trick is to start tabby with a `--no-webserver` argument. Besides that, one needs to specify the...

I intentionally added the "disabled_capabilities" to the config above because the AI/LLM completions are relatively expensive to compute, and the completion popup only appears when the responses from all active...

Thanks for the report. I believe it happens because this entire block in the `SessionBuffer` class is faulty: https://github.com/sublimelsp/LSP/blob/9065e1f5f9546caf35b329f831626a895318f1ce/plugin/session_buffer.py#L346-L356 This runs after document changes, but for each SessionBuffer (i.e. for...

> [sublimehq/sublime_text#6188](https://github.com/sublimehq/sublime_text/issues/6188). Okay but that still looks like a different issue to me because here we don't have any cloned views. I would think the cause of the bug described...

This is a bit tricky to fix. It seems doing the color boxes was moved from DocumentSyncListener to SessionBuffer in https://github.com/sublimelsp/LSP/commit/2b9863912636257283dd85e915f87a599af15d64 to ensure proper ordering between the `didChange` notification and...

Not sure if I entirely understand what you are trying to achieve. Usually code actions are related to your cursor position; e.g. to fix a particular diagnostic, refactor something, etc....

~~Besides what I wrote above, I think the implementation from this PR would result in an infinite loop if `fallback_kinds` was given but the server doesn't return any code actions...