Jorge
I'm going to put off the next improvements in the implicit search for the next PR, since it's not high priority.
Since 0.11.x is going to take over 0.10.x, is is safe to close this?
I guess we'll publish once `0.11.x` is polished. I'll say that's gonna be soon.
This is great, thanks! Will review soon and discuss about the anonymous functions support :+1:
Hi @dzufferey! ~~Yes, indeed, this is a case supported by scala pickling. Which version are you using? Please, could you bump up to `0.11.0-M2`? We have tons of tests checking...
Well, actually I just tested this, and as you reported it's not working. I assumed that the vararg arguments was converted to `Seq` but it's converted ot `WrappedArray`. So, I'll...
That's great, I'll take care of it @dzufferey ! Hope to get back to you soon.
Most of the warnings have disappeared with #400 but some of them persist.
I'd like to point out that one can define their own picklers and unpickler for that refined type, the goal of this ticket is to do this automatically.
WDYT @jsuereth ?