Juris Vencels

 Comparison. On the left it runs, on the right it fails.

I tried running the case, getting convergence problem: ``` 500 0.4154E+10 501 0.4154E+10 ERROR:: IterSolve: Numerical Error: Too many iterations were needed. STOP 1 ``` @ettaka Can you reproduce "crappy...

In the case I shared before, the coil solver is not solved in the air. Regarding Component 2, that sounds like the cause of the problem.

Thanks, @ettaka I will proceed with further testing.

@ettaka @raback, this quick fix seems to work for crappy potentials. What could be done to have it in the devel version? > I had a look now and it...

This is the recent case I use to test homogenization + circuits. [homoCirc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16014837/homoCirc.zip) Used it for testing with/without CYCLE

Tested, seems to work fine.

It seems that the case when components are of different types, has Crappy potential errors. Case with one massive and two homo-stranded components: [case1_oneMassivetwoStranded_testing.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16094879/case1_oneMassivetwoStranded_testing.zip)

Indeed, associating it with CoilSolver works.  I am assuming the transformer has solid and stranded wire types. All windings are connected to circuits.

A stranded component with homogenization can be primary, while a massive/foil/stranded component without homogenization can be secondary. All combinations are possible. For reference, such solvers are used for non-homogenized components:...