Justin Edelson

@jwadolowski perhaps this is OT (but perhaps not), but why did you have to do an uninstall in the first place? It seems to me like simply installing the min...

I believe the order is from lowest ranking to highest ranking. See https://felix.apache.org/apidocs/configadmin/1.4.0/org/osgi/framework/ServiceReference.html#compareTo(java.lang.Object) So it is likely that you'll need to reverse the order on access. Or use `RankedServices` instead...

it should. See https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/models/impl/injectors/OSGiServiceInjector.java#L100 There was a bug that this didn't work properly in a request-adaptable model. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5664. But that was fixed a while ago and should be in...

@schoudry I've done some further cleanup on this to remove the sample code -- since the normal template contains no sample code, it stands to reason that a "simple" template...

well, it creates the pom files and the folders. IMO, anything more would require prompts, so I'm not sure how to balance the desire for minimal prompts with anything more...

@schoudry there's a few problems with sample code, mostly that it stays around (I don't know how many projects I've seen in production with the filter from the old archetype...

well, why not put the sample code behind one prompt? it is only one additional prompt. alternatively, you could skip the prompt and only allow the inclusion of sample code...

I like this idea, but should it be an option to create it?

You can workaround this by adding this into the root pom.xml file right inside the `` element: ``` com.day.jcr.vault content-package-maven-plugin ```

For WF Cleanup, would it make sense to target only the DAM workflows? Something like: Do you want to automatically purge DAM workflows? [yes] How many days of DAM workflows...