BIT_CD icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
BIT_CD copied to clipboard

How could I upgrade the accuracy?

Open autumoon opened this issue 2 years ago • 7 comments

I have trained the model by the data you gived(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw code:l7iv), while the accuracy is always lower the the pretrained model. i have upgrade the max_epochs to 500, while i have the same problem(Lastest model updated. Epoch_acc=0.8744, Historical_best_acc=0.8793 (at epoch 435)). how should i upgrade the accuracy? i have tried to change the model and so on but i don't think i got the point, would you like to give some suggestion? 3q!

autumoon avatar Sep 04 '22 01:09 autumoon

with the help of stiwfmjX ,i found that it is beacuse i don't cut the data into 256256 so the result is not good, even if i tried to resize the data into 256256, while it didn't work. I realized that it was not correct to resize the data instead of cutting the data into 256256 after the trial, so thanks a lot. above all, you should cut the data(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw code:l7iv) into 256256 before trainning to get good result. mine is "Historical_best_acc=0.9531 (at epoch 458)".

autumoon avatar Sep 14 '22 08:09 autumoon

with the help of stiwfmjX ,i found that it is beacuse i don't cut the data into 256_256 so the result is not good, even if i tried to resize the data into 256_256, while it didn't work. I realized that it was not correct to resize the data instead of cutting the data into 256_256 after the trial, so thanks a lot. above all, you should cut the data(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw code:l7iv) into 256_256 before trainning to get good result. mine is "Historical_best_acc=0.9531 (at epoch 458)".

How did you cut data(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw code:l7iv) into 256256 before trainning?

wulei1595 avatar Mar 16 '23 07:03 wulei1595

with the help of stiwfmjX ,i found that it is beacuse i don't cut the data into 256_256 so the result is not good, even if i tried to resize the data into 256_256, while it didn't work. I realized that it was not correct to resize the data instead of cutting the data into 256_256 after the trial, so thanks a lot. above all, you should cut the data(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw code:l7iv) into 256_256 before trainning to get good result. mine is "Historical_best_acc=0.9531 (at epoch 458)".

Can you share it?

wulei1595 avatar Mar 16 '23 07:03 wulei1595

with the help of stiwfmjX ,i found that it is beacuse i don't cut the data into 256_256 so the result is not good, even if i tried to resize the data into 256_256, while it didn't work. I realized that it was not correct to resize the data instead of cutting the data into 256_256 after the trial, so thanks a lot. above all, you should cut the data(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw code:l7iv) into 256_256 before trainning to get good result. mine is "Historical_best_acc=0.9531 (at epoch 458)".

Can you share it?

256x256 with no overlap

autumoon avatar Mar 16 '23 07:03 autumoon

stiwfmjX 的帮助下,我发现这是因为我没有将数据剪切成 256_256,所以结果不好,即使我尝试将数据大小调整为 256_256,而它不起作用。我意识到在试用后调整数据大小而不是将数据剪切到 256_256 是不正确的,所以非常感谢。最重要的是,您应该在训练之前将数据(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw 代码:L7IV)剪切成 256_256 以获得良好的结果。我的是“Historical_best_acc=0.9531(在纪元 458)”。

你能分享一下吗?

256x256,无重叠

Can you share the code to split the image

wulei1595 avatar Mar 16 '23 09:03 wulei1595

stiwfmjX 的帮助下,我发现这是因为我没有将数据剪切成 256_256,所以结果不好,即使我尝试将数据大小调整为 256_256,而它不起作用。我意识到在试用后调整数据大小而不是将数据剪切到 256_256 是不正确的,所以非常感谢。最重要的是,您应该在训练之前将数据(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw 代码:L7IV)剪切成 256_256 以获得良好的结果。我的是“Historical_best_acc=0.9531(在纪元 458)”。

你能分享一下吗?

256x256,无重叠

Can you share the code to split the image

这部分代码不是用python写的,是用c++编写的,如果你需要这个小工具,请添加我的QQ4589968

autumoon avatar Mar 17 '23 01:03 autumoon

在stiwfmjX的帮助下,我发现这是因为我没有将数据切成 256 256 所以结果不好,即使我尝试将数据大小调整为 256 256,但它不起作用。试用后发现调整数据大小而不是把数据切成256 256是不正确的,非常感谢。 最重要的是,你应该在训练之前将数据(https://pan.baidu.com/s/1fzNiOE7elGRmIo2h6MIhZw code:l7iv)切成256 256以获得良好的结果。我的是“Historical_best_acc=0.9531(在纪元458)”。

你好,切割后和论文结果比过高怎么理解

qianday avatar Jul 01 '23 16:07 qianday