Every working group and standing committee needs to have a public repository

[ivanov]

per the governance docs, both working groups and standing committees should

Maintain a public GitHub repository with basic information (council members, charter, public meetings, SSC representative, etc.) for purposes of transparency and consistency.

This came up a few times before, most recently in the discussion of #257 in reference to @jupyter/media-strategy-working-group , but I know there are other groups that also don't have such a public presence. (@jupyter/trademark-committee is one I know of).

committee and working groups without a github repository

• [ ] @jupyter/trademark-committee
• [ ] @jupyter/media-strategy-working-group
• ...

Just opening this up to get the ball rolling for @jupyter/executive-council to pick up as they see fit, so I can in-the-meantime refer to it in another issue.