Jun Komoda

## Memorandum At the point of 4eee732 ### Modules generated from the COM type library #### `comtypes/gen/_07D2AEE5_1DF8_4D2C_953A_554ADFD25F99_0_1_0.py` wrapper module ```py # -*- coding: mbcs -*- from ctypes import * import...

I found it off that the component name is `CoComtypesDispIfcParamTests` and the ProgID is "Comtypes.DispIfcParamTests", even though both the Dispatch and Dual interfaces are implemented. However, after going through the...

Firstly, I would like to clarify the situation. If there is a proposal for a change, there should be a problem that you are facing that would be resolved by...

> I can provide a code sample, but it will require downloading a particular COM server that is available on the web. Let me know if this is desired and...

@rrace10 Thank you for sharing the "steps to reproduce". I haven't used `safearray` much, so learning about this use case is helpful for me. It would be helpful if you...

I have summarized my concerns about changing the `_npsupport` and `safearray` codebases within the scope of this issue: 1. Tests using actual COM servers are being skipped In the tests...

@rrace10 > Using the simple change: > > ``` > comtypes.npsupport.typecodes.values() > ``` > > enables "with safearray_as_ndarray:" to work as intended and also passes all the unit tests. Does...

> I did not explore the skipped unittests in _safearray.py_, but they seem more to do with memory leak detection, so I doubt the change will have any impact, positive...

Ah, I misunderstood the timeline of PRs and merges. Thank you for your good point. Reviewers, contributors, and maintainers are all human, so I think such things are common in...

I momentarily thought that #569, which is related to `tagSAFEARRAY`, might overlap in scope with this issue. However, in terms of production code, this issue (#551) is a change proposal...